Supplementary Files
Keywords
scientific productivity
journals
How to Cite
Abstract
Despite the growing number of scientific publications reflecting a greater number of people interested in the biomedical sciences, many research groups disappear secondary to poor internal organization. From the review of the available literature, we generate a series of recommendations that may be useful for the creation of a research group or to improve the productivity of an existing group. Fluid communication between its members with a common overall policy framework allows the creation of a good foundation that will lead to the consolidation of the group.References
Trueba R, Estrada J. La base de datos PubMed y la busqueda de información cientifica. Seminarios de la Fundación Española de Reumatología 2010;11.
Hamui M. Estructura organizativa y trayectoria de un grupo de investigación científica de relaciones internacionales. Perfiles Educativos 2011;133.
Caraballo L. Manual del Investigador. 1994.
Higher education: The university experiment. Nature 2014;514:287. Combating scientific misconduct. Nat Cell Biol 2011;13:1.
Ngai S, et al. Haunted manuscripts: ghost authorship in the medical literature. Account Res 2005;12:103-114.
Redondo Capafons S, et al. [Impact of the economic crisis on the activity of a clinical research ethics committee]. Farm Hosp 2014;38:454-460.
Steneck NH. The dilemma of the honest researcher. EMBO Rep 2011;12:745.
Shanmugalingam A, et al. Research experience in psychiatry residency programs across Canada: current status. Can J Psychiatry 2014;59:586-590.
Fanelli D. How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS One 2009;4:e5738. 11. Shaw D. Authorship inflation is unethical. EMBO Rep 2014;15:1106.
Logdberg L. Being the ghost in the machine: a medical ghostwriter’s personal view. PLoS Med 2011;8:e1001071.
Gollogly L, Momen H. Ethical dilemmas in scientific publication: pitfalls and solutions for editors. Rev Saude Publica 2006;4:24-29.
Solbakk JH. What is it to do good medical ethics? On the concepts of ‘good’ and ‘goodness’ in medical ethics. J Med Ethics 2015;41:12-16.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2015 Revista Alergia México